Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 19, 2013, 05:45:33 AM
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 2008 Election Candidates  (Read 639 times)
Caffeine Cemetary
Veteran

Posts: 419

Join Date: Sep, 2007


« on: September 09, 2007, 12:15:49 PM »

Found an interesting link for the 2008 Election Hopefuls..  It doesn't go into much depth but it is a fairly good run-down on those vying for the presidency..  Thought I'd share it with anyone interested:


http://selectsmart.com/president/2008/comparethem.html
Logged
Fontaine
Ace

Posts: 2,845

Join Date: Mar, 2003


« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2007, 03:22:38 PM »

You just needs lots of money and the right people and you have a winner!

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/

Quote
MONTECITO, Calif. (AP) — Oprah Winfrey was rolling out the red carpet Saturday for Barack Obama and the high-wattage stars invited to a gala "celebration" expected to raise $3 million for the Democratic presidential candidate.

The most powerful woman in show business was set to celebrate her favorite candidate at her palatial estate in this coastal enclave south of Santa Barbara. Tickets to the sold-out private event went for $2,300 apiece, keeping them within campaign finance limits. Stevie Wonder was scheduled to perform for the guests, who were expected to include actors Will Smith, Jamie Foxx and Halle Berry.

[edit] I did that test but i then you get endless ''sponsor special offers'' and I gave up after filling up the 3th one so no results!
Logged
Reflex
Ace

Posts: 11,331

Join Date: Dec, 2001


« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2007, 12:00:15 AM »

At the top there is a blue link to 'click here' for immediate results.

Kent McManigal came out as my top candidate, but then I tend to be Libertarian.  He goes a bit far for me though.  Of the mainstream candidates, Biden, Clinton and Obama were among my tops.
Logged
fall-apart
Ace

Posts: 7,858

Join Date: Sep, 2002


« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2007, 12:45:49 AM »

Crap... based on my answers, Al Gore is my top choice, at 57%, tied with Mike Huckabee and Michael Bloomberg.

1.  Theoretical Ideal Candidate   (100%)
2. Al Gore (not announced)   (57%)  
3. Mike Huckabee   (57%)  
4. Michael Bloomberg (not announced)   (57%)  
5. Barack Obama   (55%)  
6. John McCain   (55%)  
7. Bill Richardson   (53%)  
8. Fred Thompson   (53%)  
9. Ron Paul   (50%)  
10. Joseph Biden   (48%)  
11. Wesley Clark (not announced)   (47%)  
12. Dennis Kucinich   (45%)  
13. Jim Gilmore (withdrawn)   (45%)  
14. Mitt Romney   (44%)  
15. Sam Brownback   (43%)  
16. Hillary Clinton   (43%)  
17. John Edwards   (43%)  
18. Tommy Thompson (withdrawn)   (43%)  
19. Alan Augustson (campaign suspended)   (41%)  
20. Rudolph Giuliani   (41%)  
21. Christopher Dodd   (40%)  
22. Tom Tancredo   (39%)  
23. Chuck Hagel (not announced)   (38%)  
24. Newt Gingrich (not announced)   (37%)  
25. Kent McManigal (campaign suspended)   (36%)  
26. Duncan Hunter   (34%)  
27. Mike Gravel   (16%)  
28. Elaine Brown   (15%)
Logged
Intuit
Ace

Posts: 10,355

Join Date: Oct, 2002


« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2007, 06:01:09 AM »

Quote from: "fall-apart" date="1189399549"
Crap...
Yeah it may be crap.

I don't like the way they worded the questions for example...
"Would lean toward protecting civil liberties even though it might risk our security."
...not providing an answer that simply says OBEY THE FREAKING LAWS.

The 9/11 Commission proved our intelligence agencies already had all goods on those terrorists and some of that information was brought before the highest levels of governement.  It also brought to light a particular manager within the FBI who ignored a critical report from a subordinate but the overall message basically is... many of the changes written into the Traitor Act weren't necessary and somehow even after all those changes they still can't seem to keep from breaking laws.
Logged
Reflex
Ace

Posts: 11,331

Join Date: Dec, 2001


« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2007, 08:04:03 AM »

I have to say I don't think that was the best selector I've ever seen.  It dosen't give you any ability to disqualify based on certain issues, for instance I firmly stand against any candidate who is in favor of the Patriot Act or RealID, and I could compromise practically every other principle I have to see that such a candidate was not elected.
Logged
Rocky
Ace

Posts: 7,349

Join Date: Jun, 2002


« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2007, 03:41:22 PM »

Not surprising.  Obama 08!!   For the record, I was a Clark supporter in 2004, so glad to see him up there too.  I still think he'd make an amazing VP candidate.


Theoretical Ideal Candidate   (100%)
 2.  Barack Obama   (90%)  Information link
 3.  John Edwards   (82%)  Information link
 4.  Al Gore (not announced)   (80%)  Information link
 5.  Christopher Dodd   (78%)  Information link
 6.  Wesley Clark (not announced)   (78%)
Logged
rrussell
Ace

Posts: 3,306

Join Date: Jul, 2004


« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2007, 05:42:08 PM »

Interesting... I know nothing at all about Kucinich, and yet...

    1.      Theoretical Ideal Candidate   (100%)
    2.     Dennis Kucinich   (69%)  Information link
    3.     Barack Obama   (63%)  Information link
    4.     Wesley Clark (not announced)   (58%)  Information link
    5.     Joseph Biden   (57%)  Information link
    6.     Christopher Dodd   (56%)  Information link
    7.     Alan Augustson (campaign suspended)   (56%)  Information link
    8.     Hillary Clinton   (56%)  Information link
    9.     Al Gore (not announced)   (56%)  Information link
    10.     John Edwards   (54%)  Information link
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: