| Home | About | ![]() |
Articles | ![]() |
News | ![]() |
Folding | ![]() |
Forums | ![]() |
Login | ![]() |
Register |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 pages for this article The Shuttle XPC and Linux Revolution. Part I - Installation. by Article Admin
![]()
Published: 12/07/2002
The past decade of home computing has created an almost universal stereotype of the personal computer - a large beige tower running a Microsoft Windows operating system. Yet increasingly over recent months there has been a growing trend away from this familiar and somewhat bland stereotype. Following in the footsteps of Apple, the home PC is increasingly coming in cases showing some level of aesthetic design and there are growing noises about the end of the dominance of Microsoft.
The move away from the beige case is largely the result of increasing competition amongst hardware suppliers, desperate to find a means of making their product stand apart from the competition. Computer cases are now available in a variety of materials, from elegant brushed aluminium to clear perspex, with designs ranging from a clean, almost puritanical box, through to artistic designs with references to the classic shapes of the art deco period. The past twelve months or so has also seen a growing change in attitudes towards Microsoft and their Windows Operating System (OS). Microsoft clearly remain the dominant force in the OS marketplace and retain their almost complete monopoly over the home computer. It is easy to knock Microsoft, but the success of home computer and its penetration into the home on a scale unimaginable a decade ago is due, almost exclusively, to their vision of bringing computing to the masses. However, all great empires come to an end at some point, and there is growing evidence that Windows may not be the only dominant force in the OS market at the end of this decade. Finally, however, many home users are becoming increasingly uneasy with what they perceive as an encroachment of Microsoft on their personal freedoms. Ironically, Microsoft’s most stable and user friendly OS to date - Windows XP - was the start of much of this concern. For the first time, software licensing is rigorously enforced with the Windows XP product activation process, requiring users to register with Microsoft within 30 days or the system refuses to operate. Just as many homes begin to have several computers, one for each family member, product activation means the user must buy a new licence for every computer in the home. Of course, this is absolutely within the rights of Microsoft to ask for this - but with an 85% profit margin on each license of Windows sold, it leaves a bitter taste in many peoples’ mouths. Together with product activation, Windows XP saw a much enhanced profile for the Microsoft Passport scheme, requiring you to register personal details with Microsoft to benefit from XP’s integrated support features. Windows XP has also adopted a much more paternal attitude, often refusing to install drivers or software if it doesn’t approve of them. This can normally be circumvented - but it adds to the impression of Microsoft taking control. Windows also retains its reputation for instability (largely unjustified with Windows XP) and for security holes and vulnerabilities (justified, but possibly no worse than anything else on offer). Ironically, just as Microsoft Windows is becoming less attractive to many home users, an alternative is emerging from the wings. Linux. The history of Linux is well documented, and is the brain child of Finnish hacker Linus Torvalds beginning in 1991. However, it has taken over a decade for Linux to emerge from the obscurity of the geek’s bedroom and the hacker’s lab to reach a sufficiently mature and user-friendly state that it is feasible to discuss its use for a home computer. The growth of Linux is far from slowing, and it is becoming increasingly commonplace for manufacturers to now directly provide Linux support for their products. In addition, several big names in the computer industry such as IBM and Sun Microsystems are donating considerable resources to the Linux development process, resulting in a system that rivals Windows in many areas. That said, it would be premature to pretend that Linux is yet as suitable for the average consumer as Windows - but the gap is closing rapidly. Arguably the greatest barrier remaining to the mainstream success of Linux is its support for computer gaming, an area being actively addressed. And so, it is quite feasible that whilst the beige box and Microsoft dominated home computing in the 1990’s, the first decade of the 21st century may see the growth of a new model for computing: the small form factor PC and Linux. LAN adapter configurationNext, the Linux installer detects the Shuttle´s integrated Realtek 8100B 10/100MB/s LAN adapter and allows me to configure the IP addresses. I am using the LAN adapter to connect to the Internet using an ADSL ethernet modem with an always-on PPP connection with PAT address translation (the modem is responsible for dialing in) and built-in routing.. Connection to the Internet under Linux was therefore trivial - I simply assigned the LAN adapter a local IP address 10.0.0.150 and subnet mask 255.255.255.0 and then gave it the gateway address of 10.0.0.138 which corresponded to my ADSL ethernet modem. I also needed to provide it with the IP addresses of the primary and secondary DNS servers used by my ISP (these will certainly be different for you!). This was all I needed to do to establish my Internet connection. If you don plan to use your Shuttle´s LAN adapter to connect to the internet you can leave the network unconfigured at this stage.
Having configured your Shuttle´s Realtek 8100B LAN adapter, the installer offers you the chance to configure the built-in firewall. For now I recommend you leave the firewall on its default settings. A later article will discuss the Linux firewall in more details.
(0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25) (0 of 25)
Page 1 of 1 pages for this article Search
|