1 of 3
1
What was the single most influential event in PC History? 
Posted: 23 January 2003 09:34 PM  
Moderator
Total Posts:  43
Joined 

What was the single most influential event in PC History?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 January 2003 09:34 PM   [ # 1 ]  
Moderator
Total Posts:  43
Joined 

AMD recently sent out a PR letter announcing a survey the Sunnyvale chipmaker is conducting.  The survey asks questions about breakout events in world history.  Several winners will be drawn and given Athlon 64 systems as prizes.</P>

Participating in this survey really got me thinking about what events were most important to computing history.  Of course, that led directly to questions about the history of the PC.  Some might say that IBM’s 1981 announcement of the 5150 Personal Computer was the milestone for advancement of a reclusive and mainly government supported industry.  Others would give Steve Jobs and John Wozniak that credit for the development of their prototype ‘home computer’ in 1976.  </P>

Overall, hundreds of companies have done their part in contributing to the PC era.  Processors, memory, storage, video, audio, and peripherals have all come leaps and bounds from the beginning stages of PC development.  What was that huge turning point?  When did the PC become something more than a ‘rich man’s toy’?  The answer may be easy for some of you, but hopefully I can get you asking those questions of yourself yet again.  As I go through a brief history of momentous events in recent computer history, I’d like you to really put that brain to work and add your thoughts to those of the masses.  Perhaps our collective mental capacity will help to come up with the answer to questions long pondered.

The best thing I can think of to do is to start at the beginning.  To be first is not always to be most important, but being number one does lend a lot of credit.  The first major turning point would have to be credited to Intel for the invention of the MPU (Micro Processing Unit) in 1971.  This invention was surrounded by quite a bit of controversy.  It turns out Intel and Busicom, the company they had contracted to create the processor for, both thought the MPU 4004 would only be useful for calculators.  If not for consistent argument from Ted Hoff, a former Stanford researcher and the brains behind the project, the CPU we all know and love may have never come to be.  At the time, Busicom had drafted that all processes were to be handled by separate semi-conductors. </P>

The year was 1977, and Radio Shack was a booming electronics supplier.  They had over 7000 stores and provided everything any avid radio operator could imagine needing.  As the owner of the chain of hobby shops, Charles Tandy felt the need to produce a product that could compete with the likes of current offerings such as Processor Technology’s SOL and Steve Jobs’ Apple II.  The solution turned out to be the TRS-80.  The $599.95 unit had a total of 4k memory and made use of the Zilog Z-80 processor created by several ex-Intel engineers.  This processor was built upon the Intel 8080 and offered a more powerful solution, while still remaining compatible with the architecture.  The TRS-80 was the first home computer with a warranty, which would be voided by opening the case.  Thus, TRS-80 users generally had no idea how the machine actually worked.  The less a user knew of the insides of their systems, the more Radio Shack could sell to the general public.  Otherwise, people could buy more powerful kits that were assembled at home.</P>

In 1980, Seagate Technology created the world’s first Microcomputer Hard Disk Drive.  Coming in at a whopping 5MB, five times that of a standard 1MB floppy disk, the product allowed for huge advancements in the way data was stored.  A permanent storage device allowed for much faster and easier access to operating systems and other software.  Removable media could still be used to transport files, but computing as we know it would never have been without the hard disk.  </P>

IBM, a long-time leader in computer and mainframe development, took the obvious step for their product line and developed the world’s first branded Personal Computer.  The 5150’s were small and inexpensive enough that middle class could afford to write their documents in style.  Unlike some earlier concepts in the industry, the PC came with everything, including a monitor, printer, and keyboard.  It was the perfect solution for business owners and for after-work projects.  Even though the unit wasn’t as powerful as those offered by other companies, it was incredibly easy to upgrade.  The motherboard allowed for expansion of memory and included serial and parallel ports for extra peripherals.  By obtaining the rights to the name Personal Computer, IBM had bought the ability to own a significant portion of a new industry.  </P>

MOS, a subsidiary of Commodore International, LTD., developed state of the art video and sound chips in 1981.  These chips were offered to any company who wanted to make the world’s best video game.  Of course, by video game, they meant what we now call a video game console.  The design was meant for a machine that would connect to a television and use cartridges or tapes such as we saw from Atari and later Nintendo.  As it turned out, Commodore, whose VIC 20 was just about at the end of its usefulness, decided to use these chips in their long awaited C-64 home computer.  The Commodore 64, announced in 1982, went on to be the best selling unit in computer history.  The first model initially sold for about $500 and Commodore was able to drop that price to under $100 thanks to incredible sales.  Department stores across the country carried the computer and peripherals and offered them at a price many people could afford. </P>

In 1983, just two years after IBM began selling the 5150, Compaq had successfully reverse-engineered IBM’s newest products and created their own 100% IBM-compatible PC clone.  The seemingly small event quickly drew IBM’s reign as the superior, dominant producer to an end.  This also marked the beginning of a massive influx of other companies claiming to sell their very own PC clone products.  Those that could produce truly compatible machines were very successful, while those who didn’t generally failed.  Compaq was not one of those who failed.  In the first year, more than 53,000 PC’s were shipped.  By the next year, Compaq began selling units in Europe where they were able to grab a large percentage of the market.</P>

Just as IBM began to dominate the industry and not long after Compaq was ripping apart that IBM 5150, Steve Jobs released Apple Macintosh home computer.  By all appearances, Jobs had created a truly different product.  The addition of a complete GUI (Graphical User Interface), built-in monitor, a keyboard, and a mouse really drew the attention of the average “Joe”.  Of course, that person never was able to afford a Macintosh.  At $2495, it was a lot more expensive than most other computers designed for home users.  The fact that it had a much faster processor and a lot more memory couldn’t really account for the cost.  This was the beginning of Apple filling a niche in the industry.  The average user wasn’t willing to pay the premium asked, no matter how good the product might have been.</P>

<a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=314">The rest of the Editorial</a>

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 12:46 AM   [ # 2 ]  
Green
Total Posts:  18
Joined 

I think that without the first CPU that was cheap and used in first PCs there would probably never be the PC industry we know now. So this CPU is very important as it started the whole thing. And the next turning point in my eyes is birth of Linux. It started to turn the software (and hardware) industry upside down. It once again introduced concept of open source and its GPL licencing ensures fair and ethical use of the code. Opensource boom soon followed Linux example and now we have a lot of excellent free opensorce apps that are very important to keep the price of the complete PC down. And in the future it will be even more important. Linux and opensource also enabled us to get very low priced PC like systems (like the one from Shuttle). They have a very low price so almost everyone can buy a system nowdays. And the excellent stability and security of Linux and it’s price also did good things to propriatery software vendors who started to pay more attention to these very important areas. 

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 03:57 AM   [ # 3 ]  
Regular
Total Posts:  233
Joined 

Several points of mine:

* In the beginning of the 90’s, PCs became affordable, much because of the many 386 clones that appeared on the market. They were also good performers, with the SVGA graphics and IDE hard drives.

* From there the PC tugged on slowly, until Intel advertised their new 486DX2 CPU for GAMERS and not business professionals. This was something new in the industry afaik.

* The next big thing are the “really low price” PCs, which came in the break between 486DX4 100 and Pentium. Now *everyone* could suddenly afford a PC… and everyone wanted PCs… or.. at least their parents wanted PCs. The kids still had their nintendo consoles.

* Then, when gaming started to get dull on PC again, 3DFX released the product that introduced the technology that must be one of the most important selling factor of PCs today: *good* accelerated 3D graphics.

Since this period, PC selling rates have propably been increasing in about the same speed. I can’t think of anything that could have revolutionized the PC market after 3DFX - well except for great performance CPUs to low prices, but that’s merely an evolution.

I do not include the Internet, as it is more or less platform independent… (that’s propably why all “WWW for dummies"-book screenshots are from the Mac). 

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 05:06 AM   [ # 4 ]  
Green
Total Posts:  35
Joined 
Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 05:14 AM   [ # 5 ]  
Green
Total Posts:  35
Joined 

<butterfingers>

Personally, I would have to say the dawning of the Macintosh was the most influential. As a TRaSh-80 user in ‘79-’80 and the owner of a ][ c, the Mac OS opened my eyes that all did not need to be CLI (Command Line Interface). Nothing wrong with CLI, but whole desktop metaphor made computers much more user friendly. Having worked for years doing end user support, I find new users are less intimidated with the desktop gui that CLI, but YMMV. 

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 07:31 AM   [ # 6 ]  
Game Guru
Total Posts:  21675
Joined 

Aside from the obvious such as the first cpu,and other basic tech the introduction of 3d graphics by Rendition and 3dfx changed the market forever making pcs more than just utility items.

Now consumers saw pcs as all in one devices for entertainment not just work and this enhanced sales and future developments all keyed to enhancing the performance for these purposes.

Today we see this home theater setups,killer gaming rigs and nice multimedia setups for the average family.

Without the improvement in graphics technology sound and other advancements may not have come as quickly to the consumer market.

I would include with this Intels introduction of Agp which at the time really helped with the average videocard not having alot of ram and allowing use of onboard video without adding additional ram to the board. This opened the door to other onboard features and smaller form factors for smaller pcs,CC

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 08:20 AM   [ # 7 ]  
Green
Total Posts:  1
Joined 

WHAT? No mention of the Amiga? You simply can’t write such an article without mentioning the Amiga. Plain and simple. The Amiga (for me, at least) was the single biggest event in the evolution of the PC. It was the biggest turning point taking computing into the realm of multimedia. The Amiga revolutionized the computer industry and at the same time did the same for the video/film industry. It was so far ahead of it’s time in almost every respect from the preemptive multi-tasking OS to the multi-processor custum chip architecture. It’s funny to think but did you know that even today a PC cannot even format a floppy without a major performance impact? A 1985-93 Amiga can do this simple task and not even steal a single cycle from it’s 7.14Mhz CPU.

...and BTW, the frist Pentium started at 60Mhz not 75 as stated in the article. If any of you remember, there was a lot of press about the major overheating problems it had (the 60Mhz one).

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 08:42 AM   [ # 8 ]  
Ace
Total Posts:  1519
Joined 

iguana, thanks for the information.  I could have sworn it started at 60, but while I was researching, I mostly saw references to 75MHz being the first.  Several tech journals led me to the conclusion that perhaps I was wrong about the Pentium “60”.  I love to be proven right and would appreciate your help.  If you could please provide a reliable source where this can be determined, I’d be happy to change the passage. 

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 09:11 AM   [ # 9 ]  
Regular
Total Posts:  205
Joined 

<< ...and BTW, the frist Pentium started at 60Mhz not 75 as stated in the article. If any of you remember, there was a lot of press about the major overheating problems it had (the 60Mhz one). >>

That’s correct. At launch it was 60 and 66 MHz (30 and 33 MHz FSB, except “FSB” wasn’t invented as a word then). They were extremely hot chips! (0.70 mu?). A die shrink later Intel introduced 90 and 100 MHz P5s. THEN they made the 75 MHz (on a 25 MHz bus!!!) to kill the 486 - AMD was becomming too successful making the 486DX4.

Mike

EDIT: One reference could be http://www.pcmech.com/show/processors/35/3/

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 09:17 AM   [ # 10 ]  
Ace
Total Posts:  3827
Joined 

All of you seem to be concentrating on events that have happened in recent memory. I would suggest that a major event to be included is CMDR Grace Hopper’s work on COBOL. (I see the eyeballs rolling already.) Let’s put this in historical context.

Originally computers were “programmed” by hard wiring plug boards to perform a set series of calculations to achieve a desired result such as the trajectory of a shell from field artillery. CMDR Hopper and her group conceived of a general purpose language that would allow computers to be programmed using coded instructions that could be contained on punch cards rather than hard wired on the plug boards. (Think of it as setting all of the jumpers [that we no longer have] on your motherboard for each calculation.)

This advanced the usability of computers and allowed for the development of “programs.” Without her pioneering work general purpose computers as we know them today would not have been possible.

Wood

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 11:31 AM   [ # 11 ]  
Regular
Total Posts:  140
Joined 

When IBM brought out its first PC’s, I was working at their hard drive manufacturing facility in the Silicon Valley.  IBM gave heavy discounts to employees wanting to buy these machines.  There was a lot of excitement in the air at that time.  This staid, ancient company was trying everything. 

When Plusar came out with one of the first digitial wristwatches (an LED-based display), IBM had developed one but decided not to market it.

IBM contributions (plus Xerox PARC’s lack of patenting the mouse and other features) gave the PC a good start.

-Dickface-icon-small-happy.gif border=0

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 11:40 AM   [ # 12 ]  
Ace
Total Posts:  1418
Joined 

<< When did the PC become something more than a ‘rich man’s toy’?  >>

Unfortunately, the easy answer to this question is the same as that for cell phones:  when the companies sold enough units to put up more towers and get more users into their networks, they could offer their goods more cheaply.  Same for PCs, they became cheap when the manufacturers sold enough units to finance inexpensive and efficient fab processes.

But I think the biggest advance is moving from the vacuum tube to the semiconducter.  No desktop would have been possible without minimizing size.

 Signature 

What I do for a living

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 11:59 AM   [ # 13 ]  
Game Guru
Total Posts:  21675
Joined 

Go back a bit further and the punchcard was the grandaddy of binary code we see today and some might argue this was an important event,CC

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 12:13 PM   [ # 14 ]  
Regular
Total Posts:  205
Joined 

<< Go back a bit further and the punchcard was the grandaddy of binary code we see today and some might argue this was an important event,CC >>

Sure, but punchcards and “PC History” doesn’t add up wink

I vote for Zilog Z80. This little fellow actually started “personal computers”. IBM rushed out their “pc” based on what they had on their dekstop. The IBM PC wasn’t a science project, rather a “want one too” thing…

Mike

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 January 2003 12:16 PM   [ # 15 ]  
Ace
Total Posts:  5707
Joined 

How about this “little” invention in 1947

<a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.pbs.org/transistor/background1/events/miraclemo.html" target=blank>The Transistor</A>
Without it, there would be no CPU. A modern CPU uses billions of transistors

 Signature 

At large…

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 3
1